Planner and task creation before code is written.
Future concept · not available today
Your team decides what to build. Runzivo carries the loop.
This page describes a future direction, not a current product. The idea: product teams discuss the work, and Runzivo would understand the decision, plan the change, write the code, test it, open the pull request, deploy a preview, verify the result, and report back. Today, Runzivo V1 is managed Linux x64 runners for GitHub Actions.
Main flow
The delivery loop at a glance.
Product context flows into planning and build. Passing changes move forward. Failed checks loop back until the feature is ready for review.
Full delivery loop
From product conversation to verified feature.
Runzivo is not only an AI CI runner. The runner layer becomes the execution engine underneath a broader delivery workflow.
- 01
Product Team
Slack, Google Meet, tickets, docs, and product decisions.
- 02
Runzivo Context Agent
Watches collaboration channels, joins meetings, reads project material, extracts decisions, and builds project context.
- 03
Runzivo Planner
Turns requirements into tasks, implementation plans, acceptance criteria, and risk or dependency checks.
- 04
Runzivo Build
Uses Codex or a coding agent to create a branch, write code, and prepare commits for review.
- 05
Runzivo CI Runners
Runs builds, unit tests, integration tests, security scans, lint, and policy checks inside Firecracker isolation.
- 06
Pull Request
Packages the code, test results, change summary, and human approval boundary when the team requires one.
- 07
Runzivo Deploy
Creates preview environments, deploys to Kubernetes where configured, runs health checks, and keeps rollback visible.
- 08
Verification
Runs smoke tests, E2E tests, log and metric checks, and feature validation before calling the work complete.
- 09
Product Team Review
Reviews the feature, gives feedback, approves the change, or sends Runzivo back through the fix-and-retry loop.
Failure path
When CI, security checks, deployment, or verification fails, Runzivo reads the result, fixes the change, and reruns the loop instead of handing the team a broken artifact.
Persistent project knowledge
Runzivo gets more useful over time.
Slack discussions, meeting notes, tickets, docs, pull requests, CI failures, deployment results, and review feedback feed a persistent Runzivo Project Context. The point is to avoid starting from a blank page every time the team asks for a change.
Concept scope
The delivery system around the runners.
A complete version of this concept would cover the whole path from decision to verification, with visible gates where product teams keep control.
Branch, code, commit, and pull request workflow instead of direct main-branch changes.
Runzivo runners as a major execution block, including Firecracker isolation.
Quality and security gates across build, test, scan, lint, and policy checks.
Failure loops that send CI results back to the coding agent for fixes.
Human approval boundaries for PR merge, production deploys, and database migrations.
Preview environments before production release.
Post-deployment verification with tests, health, logs, metrics, and feature validation.
Persistent project context from Slack, meetings, docs, PRs, and failures.
Human approval boundary
Autonomous where useful. Controlled where it matters.
Runzivo can do the repetitive work, but teams should be able to require approval before the moments that change production risk.
- Pull request merge
- Production deployment
- Database migration
- High-risk dependency change
Future concept