The pain
More generated changes still need dependable validation before they reach a release branch.
Proposed first cohort · AI teams
More generated code. The same testing bottleneck.
Bring your agent-created pull requests or evaluation suite. Let’s co-build the runner setup that tests them before release, without turning your product team into a runner team.
Runzivo’s current V1 scope covers approved GitHub Actions workflows on Linux x64. Runzivo proposes build-partner pilots as co-development work. Future integrations and capabilities require separate decisions.
Build with RunzivoRunzivo proposes paid or co-funded build-partner pilots with an agreed budget. These pilots are separate from the planned free, controlled Early Access program.
The workflow
One pain. One workload. A focused way to evaluate the workflow.
The workload
Test agent-created pull requests, run CPU-compatible evaluation suites, and validate SDK or package changes.
The pilot
Start with one CPU-compatible validation workflow and agree how the current setup will be measured before changing the runner path.
A useful starting point
Who should bring this workflow to Runzivo?
- Buyer
- AI platform lead or developer-tools founder.
- Qualification
- Identify CPU-only workloads and any calls to external model APIs. GPU execution sits outside this initial pilot, is not part of V1, and is a separate product decision.
What we would measure
Use the workflow evidence, not a promise.
- Time to validated change
- Evaluation turnaround
- Repeat-run consistency
- Cost per completed suite
Co-develop a pilot
Bring the workflow. Set the baseline. Judge the result.
Build with RunzivoOr email partners@runzivo.dev directly if your browser has no mail app configured.