The pain
Running grading workflows at peak submission time can turn execution infrastructure into a separate operational concern.
Specialist partnership · Edtech
Teach the course. Don’t run the runner fleet.
Bring your grading workflow. Co-build bounded execution for student submissions while your platform keeps control of assignments, scoring, and feedback.
Runzivo’s current V1 scope covers approved GitHub Actions workflows on Linux x64. Runzivo proposes build-partner pilots as co-development work. Future integrations and capabilities require separate decisions.
Build with RunzivoRunzivo proposes paid or co-funded build-partner pilots with an agreed budget. These pilots are separate from the planned free, controlled Early Access program.
The workflow
One pain. One workload. A focused way to evaluate the workflow.
The workload
Run existing grading tests against student or candidate submissions with scoped access and execution limits.
The pilot
Work with the platform owner on a bounded proof of concept for one existing grading workflow and define pass/fail conditions before scale.
A useful starting point
Who should bring this workflow to Runzivo?
- Buyer
- Assessment-platform founder or engineering lead, or a course technical owner.
- Qualification
- Establish who owns grading, identity, repositories, and the interface, then map peak submission loads.
What we would measure
Use the workflow evidence, not a promise.
- Time to feedback
- Cost per submission
- Peak queue time
- Timeout enforcement
- Separation tests
Co-develop a pilot
Bring the workflow. Set the baseline. Judge the result.
Build with RunzivoOr email partners@runzivo.dev directly if your browser has no mail app configured.